Type your comment> @f00l8r1t3 said:
Type your comment> @ajdumanhug said:
Type your comment> @f00l8r1t3 said:
@ajdumanhug
I would have tried Watson a long time ago … if there was a free way to try any of it. There is not, apparently, where I am located or connecting from. Also saying “Watson” is like saying “Adobe” which many do when they mean “Acrobat.”
If Watson is required for this Challenge, why not point that way by alluding to Sherlock or Moriarty or something that is clueful?
There’s a free Watson thing and there are many free sites out there.
We have the numbers.
That has never been the issue. Your suggestion of Watson seemed to imply it was part of decoding or deciphering those numbers, not transcribing them.
The issue is the numbers. We are told they are coordinates. One assumes cartesian given the context of the storyline. These numbers do not map given any form of geospatial coordinate encoding system that I have come across in my researches.
The link you gave is the speech-to-text I found and used the day the challenge was released. My frustration and others on here is that these numbers are absurdly large and nonsensical given the storyline and context.
Rabbit Hole, I guess. Read the message carefully and there are lots of hints there.